The purpose of this lab is to perform a simple evaluation of three different brands of calcium hydroxide:
The "Kalkwasser" was prepared in 3 1.25 L soft drink bottles.
The results for 1 "level teaspoon" of each sample are shown in Table 1.
Table 1: Results after 1 measure of samples.
|
|
Seachem |
InstaKalkTM |
"LIMIL" |
Clarity |
Almost clear |
Cloudy |
Partially cloudy |
Sedimentation |
Almost none |
2-3 mm |
<1 mm |
pH |
12.22 |
11.74 |
12.12 |
Calcium (mg/L) |
500 |
90 |
470 |
The results for 2 "level teaspoons" of each sample are shown in Table 2.
Table 2: Results after 2 measures of samples.
|
Seachem |
InstaKalkTM |
"LIMIL" |
Clarity |
Cloudy |
Cloudy |
Cloudy |
Sedimentation |
2-3 mm |
3-6 mm |
3-4 mm |
pH |
12.37 |
12.13 |
12.40 |
Calcium (mg/L) |
730 |
300 |
730 |
The quantity in each sample was chosen such that one "measure" would produce something less than a saturated solution as this should show variation in the samples more obviously. Two "measures" should have produced a saturated solution, however, the calcium levels suggest the solution is not quite saturated. A saturated calcium hydroxide solution should have a calcium concentration approximately 900 mg/L.
As the methods used result in imprecise measurements, no definitive conclusions can be made. However, the evaluation shows trends that suggest that the inexpensive "LIMIL" brand calcium hydroxide should produce similar results to Seachem brand. The amount of sedimentation with the "LIMIL" brand was quite low which suggests either low levels of impurities, or those impurities are quite soluble.
The results of the InstaKalkTM were not very good. It is possible that this is partially due to the sample being quite old, but even when new there was noticeably more sediment produced.
Last updated: August 11, 2001